Questions
numberFire.com
San Jose Sharks
SJ
VAN @ SJ
Projected Goals: 2.77
Proj Goals: 2.77
Vancouver Canucks
VAN
VAN @ SJ
Projected Goals: 3.30
Proj Goals: 3.30
Richard Perkins
oliver naylor
-
0That Guy (500 Reputation Points)Fitzpatrick has done very well this season and is the most consistent of the 3.
-
-1Rhett Kinard (576 Reputation Points)i don't think you can go wrong with fitz or taylor. philly pass d is miserable
-
0ross minor (500 Reputation Points)Talbot and Lack are my go ahead guys. Talbot my number one because he is at home against a bad team. That's my 2 cents good luck tonight.
BENJAMIN POLYAK
Rj Hill
-
0Liam (500 Reputation Points)I just joined for 1 month $9.99 premium with coupon code (PlayingLegal)
Jake Sanders
-
0Rayford Munk (500 Reputation Points)I watched NFL with NFLSQTV .COM and I think they have the best option to watch regular season too.
-
0Andy Brown (305 Reputation Points)....well, which catchers do you have?
John Velez
Channing Hindel
-
2Ryan Evans (444 Reputation Points)As I've said elsewhere, I would prefer what is now called the "freeform" method of posting questions and getting feedback from others be the normal, as before. I'm fine with the new add/drop, start/sit, etc. "poll" type of questions being offered, but perhaps on a separate section of the site, or as an optional alternative to the freeform.
I think I speak for many users when I say I began visiting this site regularly for the articles and for the way the "freeform" question system worked. It was refreshing being able to discuss difficult fantasy decisions candidly with other players who use NumberFire's metrics and site. Now, with the canned poll-style questions being pushed, this is now simply like many, many other sites out there. It has lost it's unique appeal, and a critical piece that brought many to NumberFire in the first place.
I don't run the site and certainly don't have insight into reason this decision was made. I'm sure it was discussed at length and not some snap decision. But again, I think I speak for many others when I say I liked the freeform as it was and now find it difficult to sort through a screen full of high-level "select player A, B, or C" questions to get at the information and topics I really want.
Just my two cents.
numberFire.com
San Jose Sharks
SJ
VAN @ SJ
Projected Goals: 2.77
Proj Goals: 2.77
Vancouver Canucks
VAN
VAN @ SJ
Projected Goals: 3.30
Proj Goals: 3.30
BENJAMIN POLYAK
Richard Perkins
John Velez
Jake Sanders
-
0ross minor (500 Reputation Points)Talbot and Lack are my go ahead guys. Talbot my number one because he is at home against a bad team. That's my 2 cents good luck tonight.
Channing Hindel
-
2Ryan Evans (444 Reputation Points)As I've said elsewhere, I would prefer what is now called the "freeform" method of posting questions and getting feedback from others be the normal, as before. I'm fine with the new add/drop, start/sit, etc. "poll" type of questions being offered, but perhaps on a separate section of the site, or as an optional alternative to the freeform.
I think I speak for many users when I say I began visiting this site regularly for the articles and for the way the "freeform" question system worked. It was refreshing being able to discuss difficult fantasy decisions candidly with other players who use NumberFire's metrics and site. Now, with the canned poll-style questions being pushed, this is now simply like many, many other sites out there. It has lost it's unique appeal, and a critical piece that brought many to NumberFire in the first place.
I don't run the site and certainly don't have insight into reason this decision was made. I'm sure it was discussed at length and not some snap decision. But again, I think I speak for many others when I say I liked the freeform as it was and now find it difficult to sort through a screen full of high-level "select player A, B, or C" questions to get at the information and topics I really want.
Just my two cents.
-
0Rayford Munk (500 Reputation Points)I watched NFL with NFLSQTV .COM and I think they have the best option to watch regular season too.
-
0Andy Brown (305 Reputation Points)....well, which catchers do you have?
Rj Hill
-
0Liam (500 Reputation Points)I just joined for 1 month $9.99 premium with coupon code (PlayingLegal)
oliver naylor
-
0That Guy (500 Reputation Points)Fitzpatrick has done very well this season and is the most consistent of the 3.
-
-1Rhett Kinard (576 Reputation Points)i don't think you can go wrong with fitz or taylor. philly pass d is miserable
numberFire.com
San Jose Sharks
SJ
VAN @ SJ
Projected Goals: 2.77
Proj Goals: 2.77
Vancouver Canucks
VAN
VAN @ SJ
Projected Goals: 3.30
Proj Goals: 3.30
BENJAMIN POLYAK
-
0Rayford Munk (500 Reputation Points)I watched NFL with NFLSQTV .COM and I think they have the best option to watch regular season too.
-
0Andy Brown (305 Reputation Points)....well, which catchers do you have?
Richard Perkins
Rj Hill
-
0Liam (500 Reputation Points)I just joined for 1 month $9.99 premium with coupon code (PlayingLegal)
John Velez
oliver naylor
-
0That Guy (500 Reputation Points)Fitzpatrick has done very well this season and is the most consistent of the 3.
-
-1Rhett Kinard (576 Reputation Points)i don't think you can go wrong with fitz or taylor. philly pass d is miserable
Jake Sanders
-
0ross minor (500 Reputation Points)Talbot and Lack are my go ahead guys. Talbot my number one because he is at home against a bad team. That's my 2 cents good luck tonight.
Channing Hindel
-
2Ryan Evans (444 Reputation Points)As I've said elsewhere, I would prefer what is now called the "freeform" method of posting questions and getting feedback from others be the normal, as before. I'm fine with the new add/drop, start/sit, etc. "poll" type of questions being offered, but perhaps on a separate section of the site, or as an optional alternative to the freeform.
I think I speak for many users when I say I began visiting this site regularly for the articles and for the way the "freeform" question system worked. It was refreshing being able to discuss difficult fantasy decisions candidly with other players who use NumberFire's metrics and site. Now, with the canned poll-style questions being pushed, this is now simply like many, many other sites out there. It has lost it's unique appeal, and a critical piece that brought many to NumberFire in the first place.
I don't run the site and certainly don't have insight into reason this decision was made. I'm sure it was discussed at length and not some snap decision. But again, I think I speak for many others when I say I liked the freeform as it was and now find it difficult to sort through a screen full of high-level "select player A, B, or C" questions to get at the information and topics I really want.
Just my two cents.
Sorry, there are no more questions for this feed.